• News
  • entertainment
  • telugu
  • movies
  • City Civil Court Bengaluru dismisses case against Naresh and Pavitra Lokesh's 'Malli Pelli' release; imposes house ban on Ramya Raghupati
This story is from August 2, 2023

City Civil Court Bengaluru dismisses case against Naresh and Pavitra Lokesh's 'Malli Pelli' release; imposes house ban on Ramya Raghupati

The City Civil Court in Bengaluru has rejected the case filed by Mrs. Ramya Raghupati against the release of the movies 'Malli Pelli' in Telugu and 'Matte Maduve' in Kannada. Mrs. Raghupati, who is the estranged wife of senior artist Dr. VK Naresh, sought an injunction to prevent the movies from being shown in theaters, on OTT platforms, and satellites. The court dismissed her case on August 1, 2023, stating that her claims lacked legal basis. The court ruled that the movies' content is fictional, as certified by the Indian film certification board.
City Civil Court Bengaluru dismisses case against Naresh and Pavitra Lokesh's 'Malli Pelli' release; imposes house ban on Ramya Raghupati
Pic courtesy: Twitter
In a recent legal development, the City Civil Court in Bengaluru has dismissed a case filed by Mrs. Ramya Raghupati, the estranged wife of renowned actor Dr. VK Naresh, against the release of the films 'Malli Pelli' in Telugu and 'Matte Maduve' in Kannada. The court's decision, handed down on August 1, 2023, signifies a significant victory for the filmmakers and artists involved.
Mrs.
1x1 polls
Ramya Raghupati had sought an injunction to prevent the release of the aforementioned films across various platforms, including theaters, OTT platforms, and satellites. The court carefully considered the arguments presented by both parties and ultimately ruled in favor of the film's release, dismissing Mrs. Raghupati's case on the grounds of lacking legal merit.
One of the key factors that influenced the court's decision was the certification provided by the Board of Film Certification, a government body responsible for evaluating and certifying the content of films in India. The court highlighted that the movies in question had been certified as fictional by the board, thereby undermining Mrs. Raghupati's claim that their content was defamatory or harmful.
Moreover, in a separate legal battle, the court accepted an injunction suit filed by Dr. VK Naresh and his family members, which effectively bans Mrs. Ramya Raghupati from entering Naresh's residence in Nanakranguda. This decision follows a series of legal disputes between the two parties, including allegations of domestic violence and other contentious issues.
The court's decision to impose a ban on Mrs. Raghupati's entry into Naresh's house is rooted in evidence presented by Naresh and his family members. The court acknowledged that the property was being utilized for business purposes rather than as a residence for Mrs. Raghupati. It also took note of the disruptions and anxiety caused by unidentified individuals visiting the property, thus reinforcing the need to maintain a peaceful environment for Naresh and his elderly family members.

This latest verdict from the City Civil Court not only permits the release of the contested films but also paves the way for the potential divorce of Naresh and Ramya Raghupati. Under the provision set forth by the Supreme Court, a marriage can be considered nullified if the couple has not lived together for two or more years. This legal outcome could mark a turning point in their marital journey and lead to the formal dissolution of their union.
Furthermore, it is worth noting that Mrs. Ramya Raghupati is currently facing a cybercrime case in the cyber court and cyber cell of the police. The allegations involve accusations of cyber malware and cyber-attacks directed towards Naresh. This pending case underscores the complexity of the legal disputes surrounding the estranged couple and the multifaceted nature of the challenges they are navigating.


End of Article
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA
OSZAR »